Fiscal Court November 19

1) A zoning map amendment request from SR-1 to UR-2 for a 19-acre property off Hwy 25 in Walton, for a 312-unit apartment complex across from Maher Road. Planning Commission recommended 12-1. 1st reading of ordinance: Nov 19. 2nd reading: Dec 3.

The applicant and his attorney, representing LDG Development from Louisville, spoke during the meeting. LDG Development has completed more than 100 affordable housing projects, with 29 located in Kentucky. They meet Kentucky Housing Corporation (KHC) standards and financing requirements, with deed restrictions in place for 30 years. The development is designed to cater to families with annual incomes of approximately $44,000, ensuring that no more than 30% is allowed to go toward housing costs. They are considered true affordable housing.

The developer emphasized its commitment to staying engaged with the community rather than building and leaving. This project does not include single-family homes and is situated near a mobile home park. LDG also assured attendees that all tenants would be thoroughly vetted.

The Kentucky Traffic Study has not yet received any updated information. Traffic Study District 6 reported no additional comments at this time. It was noted that both right and left turn lanes will be required for the project. Concerns were raised regarding the Diane Zimmerman Traffic Study, as it was conducted in 2020-21 during the COVID-19 pandemic when traffic levels were significantly reduced, potentially impacting the accuracy of the findings. Page 4 Assumption: The proposed 144 units with in-and-out traffic flow raises significant concerns, as it does not appear to align with current traffic patterns. Merritt Road is already heavily congested, and a right-in/right-out configuration may not effectively address the increased traffic volume. A report from the county engineer is needed to evaluate the impact and feasibility. Additionally, Highway 25 is currently a two-lane road, and two more lanes would be required to expand it to four lanes to accommodate the anticipated increase in traffic.

Local school districts have not responded to requests for comment. Given that this development includes two- and three-bedroom units, it is expected to bring additional children into the school system, which may impact capacity and resources.

The northern section of the development is anticipated to face significant access challenges. Additionally, there are concerns about whether the Kentucky rest stop in this area will be affected by the project. The Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC) has provided comments regarding Dixie Highway but has addressed the potential impact on the rest stop as none. The topography of the area presents significant challenges due to its steep grading.

Only one resident in the area has responded to the court regarding this matter, and it was noted that this individual lives approximately five miles from the proposed development. However, it was emphasized to the court that the resident’s distance from the site is irrelevant and should not influence the consideration of their input.

2) A request for a change in concept development plan for a 2.6-acre site at 3005 Verona-Mudlick Road for an expanded outdoor storage area for farm equipment. This is at an existing commercial site. 1st reading of ordinance: Nov 19. 2nd reading Dec 3.

This site spans two acres and is currently governed by a zoning map from 1994. Seeking to change the zoning designation from rural to urban/commercial services. An enforcement letter was sent to the property owner, prompting this change request. One resident voiced concerns about the visibility of old tires and other unsightly items on the property. The concerns were addressed by proposing a landscaping plan that includes the planting of trees. The resident felt these changes would enhance the aesthetics of the area and the concern was addressed and met.

3) A request for a zoning map amendment for a 44-acre lot at 1841 Holbrook Lane at Lariat Way, for 139 attached single-family residential units and 157 multi-family units. 

The recommendation from the Planning Commission is to deny the project, and as such, a resolution to accept their recommendation is on the agenda. Planning Commission denied 13-0. Resolution to accept denial is final.

Residents expressed relief and satisfaction that the proposal was not moving forward. They also voiced frustration with the builder, highlighting that none of the promised amenities have been completed. Many residents emphasized that the builder has failed to fulfill the commitments made at the time of purchase, leading to significant disappointment.

Residents expressed that their neighborhood is focused on fostering a sense of community and long-term development. They voiced concerns about one-bedroom townhouse rentals, noting that such units are less likely to attract long-term residents or families who would contribute to the stability and family-oriented atmosphere of the neighborhood.

Residents raised significant traffic concerns, noting that Route 237 is a four-lane main artery without a stoplight, creating potential safety hazards. The road’s grade was reported to be at 60%, which falls far short of Boone County’s requirement of 12%, posing a risk to emergency service providers. Additionally, residents highlighted that the proposed development lacks age restrictions, and renters may not have a vested interest in the community. They also emphasized that the existing infrastructure is not equipped to handle the estimated 2,200 daily trips, exacerbating concerns about congestion and safety.

4) A proposal to award $346,000 to The Boone Conservancy for matching funds in support of a grant to preserve some land as part of the Ohio River Conservation Corridor project. Approved by the court. 

In 1999, a 501(c)(3) organization was established for a 275-acre area across from Lawrenceburg. The conservancy has raised 76% of its fundraising goal and is seeking a $346,000 grant match. Several projects are underway in the area, including a river restoration plan funded by federal resources. Importantly, no Boone County taxpayers will be asked to contribute to this project.

Many residents were there in support of this project. When approved, they were all very happy and pleased when they left the court.

5) A resolution again considering installing EV charging stations on public property, with the county getting the revenue and being responsible for their maintenance and replacement.

Waiting to see if grant funding is granted by State of Kentucky.  Once this is known, the EV Charging Stations will be addressed.

Judge Moore is seeking a Kentucky grant for this project. However, if the grant is awarded and remains unused, it could negatively impact Boone County’s score. Commissioner Chet Hand opposes the project, arguing that Boone County should not be involved in the EV charging business. Funding must be secured before any approval for the EV stations is granted.

Observation by the BCRP reporter: this is likely to become a contentious issue. If this project is truly beneficial, why hasn’t anyone from the public sector expressed interest in this opportunity?